My personal opinion on this matter is that such a feature would be redundant. Even though I comprehend why you asked for this possibility I still believe that the given options are sufficient.

If one or more admins are online they see the votes. If they choose to postpone any action, or if they handle it but maybe not visible for the players, they prolly have good reason for it. If a lot of votes are showing up and only few admins are available, they might want to deal them but not to chat about them -hoping that noone takes it personally but understands that time is, uhm,... Rob, how much's the salary these days? (kidding)

A little information from an insider: adminning is sometimes a question of patience and power of endurance. It can be quite important to stay close to a case and watch it long enough as to gather all needed information before an admin will take action. I had to learn not to get distracted by too many votes, but to finish one case after another.

And of course, if I have to choose between some nice message from a player and a decent slurrrrrp from my coffee...

I would choose the coff of course! (again: kidding)

my two cents

That was worth a lot more than two cents Bru - well said.

Never seen someone so keen to be an admin !

I think you read that wrong, and really? This thread is dead please don't post irrelevant things.

This thread is dead? Wasn't long ago posted in, so I don't think it's dead.

I'm not sure if I'm getting the vibes right here (so I apologise beforehand if I am offending anyone) but perhaps the personal attacks might do well to be left out. Seems to me there could be some serious tension here.

Well, I have no clue what he means in his post, it seemed irrelevant.

Personal attacks??

I think you've got the wrong end of the stick REM. Arrisdaroldi was pretending to be acting mod on the forum, to which SoulAngel implied that he'd need acting/drama lessons to be, to which Arrisdaroldi was suggesting that SoulAngel had given him acting lessons. At least I reckon anyway. If I'm wrong let me know please I don't see anything wrong here, except for a bit of misunderstanding and confusion (the confusion is most probably on my part too ).
Also, I'm not sure if there's a set time limit for a thread to be classed as inactive.

Back to the subject before we all get prodded by the big green finger. You can normally tell if an admin joins your room if they ask for a reason for voting soon after a vote has been cast. Although it isn't always necessarily the case, I've asked before and I've seen others do it as well (normally if the voting was really stupid ).
Never forget that a true admin can underline their name and talk in bold font, then it's a give away

__________________

Deebs! Nice to see you, yes your version is accurate.

Thanks for the post!

LOL @ 'true admin'

I <3 Admin.

me too! Imagine the game without them

There is no `tension` or any `personal attacks` well not from me in spite of Arris ( ) repeatedly commenting on my post . Using references such as silly and irrelevant and calling me a troll and evening warning of reporting me for the heinous crime of double posting.

I find him incredibly amusing and the more threads I read the more I see how keen he is ! not only to be popular but how his quest for adminship is so blatantly clear. I have thanked him on so many threads ,I believe he is admin material . He deserves to become an admin he has all the qualities that are required.

I wish him well on his Quest, long live the ARRIS

Well glad to hear there's no 'tension' and glad I misread it.

HAPPY NEW YEAR everyone!