Casta_Diva
14-08-2009, 06:17 AM
I was listening to an interview on the radio today with a lady (I didn't catch her name, unfortunately) who was just running an interesting experiment.
You know how when you hear something that is morally "wrong", the words that generally surface to describe the incident are things like disgusting or repulsive? These are actually adjectives used for physical things, like food. The experiment that was carried out was to see if people actually feel physically disgusted when they come in contact with a story that disturbs their morals.
This is how they carried out the experiment:
The subjects were fixed up with sticky motion sensors in various places on their face, which would detect when the feeling of disgust arose (nose would wrinkle up, upper lip would raise, and any other disgust-face characteristics there are)
The subjects were then given sips of "digusting" tasting liquids (ie. too salty, bitter, sour, etc.) and their facial reactions were recorded, showing disgust as expected. Next they were shown gross pictures, like rotting meat, insects, and other things of that nature. Again, disgusted facial reactions were recorded.
Finally, a little scenario was set up. The following is the example that was given in the interview. The subjects were paired off, and given say $10 to "share" between each other. When subject A told subject B that he was going to take $9 of that and give B the other $1, subject B ended up with the disgusted facial reaction. Even though B was to be better off with $1 than she was with 0, it was still a disgusting situation.
I thought that was very interesting...even in such a non-threatening scenario, people show disgust. Is this a learned thing, do you think? Or could it be an overall reaction to displeasure?
Taking things a little bit further...does anyone ever feel physically sick when you hear a bit of a horror story on the news? Do you think that would be like an extreme version of the facial reaction experiment? Why would we feel sick if it is just a story...not something we ate, or a flu bug?
Any thoughts?
You know how when you hear something that is morally "wrong", the words that generally surface to describe the incident are things like disgusting or repulsive? These are actually adjectives used for physical things, like food. The experiment that was carried out was to see if people actually feel physically disgusted when they come in contact with a story that disturbs their morals.
This is how they carried out the experiment:
The subjects were fixed up with sticky motion sensors in various places on their face, which would detect when the feeling of disgust arose (nose would wrinkle up, upper lip would raise, and any other disgust-face characteristics there are)
The subjects were then given sips of "digusting" tasting liquids (ie. too salty, bitter, sour, etc.) and their facial reactions were recorded, showing disgust as expected. Next they were shown gross pictures, like rotting meat, insects, and other things of that nature. Again, disgusted facial reactions were recorded.
Finally, a little scenario was set up. The following is the example that was given in the interview. The subjects were paired off, and given say $10 to "share" between each other. When subject A told subject B that he was going to take $9 of that and give B the other $1, subject B ended up with the disgusted facial reaction. Even though B was to be better off with $1 than she was with 0, it was still a disgusting situation.
I thought that was very interesting...even in such a non-threatening scenario, people show disgust. Is this a learned thing, do you think? Or could it be an overall reaction to displeasure?
Taking things a little bit further...does anyone ever feel physically sick when you hear a bit of a horror story on the news? Do you think that would be like an extreme version of the facial reaction experiment? Why would we feel sick if it is just a story...not something we ate, or a flu bug?
Any thoughts?